I left my finance job 6 years ago to work for my dream boss, myself. I've never looked back. I focus on tech, gaming, and hardware reviews.
Finding a Low-Input Lag Monitor
Being a pro gamer is all about having the reaction time and in-game knowledge necessary to beat the competition. Peripherals come second with many having little to no impact on the end result.
However, a monitor with low input lag, in my opinion, can make an impact when similar skill levels are involved. Higher resolutions and a better picture may be great for eye candy, but do very little to impact your gameplay. In fact, many professional gamers in my circle turn down resolution and settings while competing.
With that let's discuss several great low-input-lag monitors that are at the top of their game for responsiveness. These include budget options, FreeSync, and G-Sync monitors, as well as IPS options.
Low-Input-Lag Monitors for FPS Gaming
Want to be competitive in a twitch-sensitive genre? Here are a few monitors we recommend for FPS, RTS, and fighting style PC and console games.
I'm not going to put this list into any rigorous order as different monitors are better for different budgets and genres. However, all of these monitors have Input lags that are competition-worthy. I wouldn't necessarily pick the monitor with the lowest input lag. Rather go with the monitor here that you like the best.
Also, this list isn't meant to be an all-inclusive G-Sync or FreeSync List.
Monitors Around $300
A few years ago IPS panels had a hurdle that few manufacturers could get over. Refresh rate. And while most gamers preferred an IPS monitor for watching movies or everyday work, many of them couldn't get past the motion blur they'd see.
The LG 27GL850-B gets rid of that hurdle and still sports an imperceptible input lag of just *2.70 ms.
In addition, it offers a 144Hz refresh rate along with adaptive-sync which gives it support for variable refresh rates for NVIDIA G-Sync and AMD FreeSync and either company's graphics card.
For more than $100 less, the LG 27GL83A-B does much of the same.
Also Decent for Photo and Video Editing
While the LG 27GL850-B makes for a great gaming monitor, it also can double as a monitor for photo editing. It comes with a factory-calibrated sRGB mode which achieves 2.2 gamma, 6500k white point, and dE of <5.
If there's one downside, it's that the brightness isn't as high as many of the other IPS panels on the market right now reaching a high of around 350 cd/m2. For me, it was plenty.
Testing and numbers aside these monitors both look amazing on all the games I tested them on. Yes, you may get a small bit of backlight bleeding. For photo editing, the solid calibration and wide gamut backlight set it apart from similar options on the market, and with a low response time and input lag, it's an ideal option for gamers.
This information can be found on the website TFTCentral.
Another great gaming monitor in the $300 space is the Acer Nitro XV272U.
The colors on this look amazing. So, if good gaming specs, no noticeable blur, and ghosting, and some eye candy for a decent price are what you're looking for, this is a good monitor to explore.
Specs include a 1440p IPS widescreen, VESA DisplayHDR 400 certification, Freesync, and G-sync compatibility. Top it off with a 1ms response time, and you've got a good start for a competitor to the LG 27L83A-B above.
Ports include DisplayPort (needed for 144Hz), HDMI 2.0, and USB options.
This is an inexpensive IPS panel done right. It gives you that TN panel performance (use action mode) with fast response times and a great picture. I highly recommend you enable HDR. It definitely makes a huge difference. Backlight bleed will vary from panel to panel and, for me, was minimal with this one.
Samsung Ultra-Wide and Curved Gaming Monitors
In the curved and ultra-wide space, I really like what Samsung is doing right now. Their 34" Odyssey Ultra-Wide G5 and G5 32" curved monitors are my favorites in the space.
I'm going to warn you ahead of time that these monitors aren't perfect when it comes to ghosting. It's not something that bothered me while I was gaming, but the response time did have a slight blur when tested at BlurBusters without FreeSync and pretty much was crystal clear with FreeSync on. If you set this monitor to overdrive mode, it's also a bit more noticeable.
With that out of the way, I'll mention why I still like these monitors. First, when compared to the G7 and G9 lines, you're getting pretty much everything here at half the price.
Not perfect, but good. And the price is right.
No, you don't get quantum dots or true HDR 600, but you do get a 165Hz Ultra WQHD panel for the 34" ultra-wide at just $599 and a 27" 144Hz QHD curved monitor for just $260. These are not flagship prices, and therefore, you're not getting a perfect experience here. However, you're coming pretty close.
The Acer Predator XB273K
If you're looking for a gaming monitor that can also do some video and photo editing for you, I really like the Acer Predator XB273K in the 4k 120Hz space. For an additional $300, the Asus ROG Strix XG27UQ may also be worth taking a look at.
The Predator gives you an amazing G-Sync 120Hz HDR experience with a bright and beautiful picture along with all of the responsiveness you're looking for in competitive gaming.
If you're like me and also make YouTube videos and edit photos, you'll also like the DCI-P3 90% Wide Color Gamut and pre-calibrated with under 1dE.
To get everything functioning, you need to use the 2 DisplayPort setup. This is a bit tricky to set up at first, but once you get it going it works just fine.
By the way, yes, the hood can either stay permanently or come off.
Overall the $600 price tag is several hundred less than when it was released a couple of years ago. You can pay more for a monitor that doesn't eschew the full array backlight, but you probably won't feel much of a difference.
Still a Solid Option: Asus VG248QE 144Hz Monitor
When I first saw the Asus VG248QE 144Hz monitor, I knew it was what I'd been waiting for. It had the old CRT-like feel without all the CRT drawbacks. For around $250 you get a 144 Hz refresh rate, 0.7ms input lag, and 1ms GTG response time. These stats make this monitor irresistible to most FPS, RTS, and twitch-style gamers.
If you're not looking for an IPS panel, FreeSync, or an integrated G-Sync monitor, then this is probably the one to own. It's a little pricey for a 24" LED screen, but not compared to similar 144hz monitors. It can be adapted for both 3D and G-Sync.
The transmitter that you need to use this monitor for 3D is not included in the package, which keeps the price down. You can also upgrade it to NVIDIA's G-Sync technology (which synchronizes refresh rate with the output of your video card) using the kit on NVIDIA's website.
That being said, I'd highly recommend you don't do this. If you want a G-Sync monitor, simply buy one that already has it incorporated into the monitor.
Other Dated Options
If you can get a deal on one of these less recent monitors, go for it.
While I really like the performance of the higher-priced / same panel Asus ROG Swift PG27UQ I couldn't get past the fan. So, if you're looking for a high-end gaming monitor with all the bells and whistles, I'd steer you towards Acer's Predator model PBMIPHZX.
Specifications include a 4k resolution, 5ms response time, 120hz refresh rate (overclocked at 144Hz), 99% Adobe RGB Gamut, and all the connectivity you need.
Tom's Hardware reported a screen draw time of just 7ms. This, along with G-sync and a high refresh rate, mean you'll finally get the type of responsiveness you're looking for in a high refresh rate, 4k, and G-Sync monitor.
In addition, in terms of viewing angles, you're getting an IPS monitor here that has viewing angles as good as most premium panels.
If you're like me and can only justify the cost of a monitor like this if you can use it for work as well, you'll like that the Predator out of the gate comes calibrated. Native color depth is 10-Bit (8-bit+FRC) / Adobe RGBHD410, which is good enough for all the photo editing and video editing I do.
Overall, this is one of my favorite high-end gaming monitors of the past couple of years. If you've got the money, and don't mind a slightly thicker monitor, I highly recommend it.
BenQ Zowie XL2546
With a much more reasonable but still fairly high price tag of $500, the BenQ Zowie XL2546 certainly deserves a place at the top of this list.
When looking at the specifications, you may think that a 1080p monitor in no way deserves a price tag at this level. However, the new Dynamic Accuracy technology, along with super-fast 240Hz refresh rate make up for the price.
Dynamic Accuracy gives you unprecedented clarity while you're in fast motion gameplay. If you've never used it before, it reduces ghosting and trailing to a level I've never seen before and is definitely something you have to try.
Cons: In spite of all the pros, this monitor is still only 1080p. Plus, the bezels are a bit thicker than some other options out there. So, I definitely wouldn't recommend it for a double or triple monitor setup. In addition, this is a TN panel monitor. So, it's certainly not for editing photos.
Console Input Lag for this is good with around an average of 13ms. That's while running at 60Hz. While I'm not sure why you'd choose this for console, it is important to note that using it at 240Hz on PC shows considerably less lag.
This is a competitive gaming monitor. So, if that's what you're looking for, this would be the first monitor I'd recommend for PC. Yes, there are cons, but the pros while gaming, for me, are too much to ignore.
There are, admittedly, a few monitors in this space with similar panels. If $500 seems like a lot, you may prefer something like the Aorus KD25F. It doesn't include the BFI feature that the Zowie has, but it certainly has a few pros vs. the Zowie XL2546 (including price tag).
Another monitor to check out would be the Acer Nitro XF252Q Xbmiiprzx which is probably the most responsive monitor I've seen overall.
$200 144Hz Monitor: Acer XFA240 FreeSync Monitor
Whether you're looking for a cheap 144hz gaming monitor or want a FreeSync option, there's a lot of value in the Acer XF240H. While FreeSync is only available to those who have an AMD GPU, the monitor itself is amazing as a stand-alone 144Hz option.
At just under $200, it's cheaper than Asus' aging option above and likewise has height, pivot, swivel, and tilt adjustment.
While it's certainly not cheap, the Asus ROG SWIFT IPS PG279QZ combines super-low input lag, a high refresh rate (144 Hz), and G-Sync compatibility to give gamers, with extra money to spend, a powerhouse option. It's an impressive G-Sync monitor.
This monitor is similar to the PG279Q, but you're more likely to find a good panel with the newer option. So, go with the new model if it's in stock.
Its 1440-pixel panel is one of the best IPS options I've seen, with crisp detail and a good level of brightness.
PG279Q vs. PG278Q
The PG279Q has big upgrades when compared to the PG279Q, including an IPS panel. Though last year's model is around $300 cheaper.
Asus PG279Q vs. Acer XB271HU
In terms of G-Sync monitors the Asus PG79Q is my favorite this year with the Acer XB271HU coming in at a close second. I found the PG279Q to just have slightly better quality for the panel. That being said, the Acer XB271HU's stand is much improved vs last year's version and doesn't lose by much.
Overall, if you're willing to pay up to have the best, this is what you want.
Under $500: BenQ EL2870U 4k HDR Gaming Monitor
The BenQ EL2870U is one of my favorite options right now for gaming, and it's just $300. Not only does it have 4k HDR and a 1ms response time, but it also has AMD FreeSync technology.
There are also other cool features like Brightness Intelligence Plus which allows the monitor to automatically adjust the brightness and color temperature.
In terms of lag, 4k isn't always the best way to go. So, remember that. That being said, this monitor averages around 10ms.
This monitor isn't flawless, and this is a TN panel. It's also a couple of years old at this point. So, viewing angles are not wide, but it is responsive and bright when placed in front of you. Ultimately, you're getting great value for the price in a large 4k HDR monitor with FreeSync. I'd recommend it for all types of games.
Affordable Console and PC Gaming FreeSync Monitor
Whether you're looking for a low input lag console gaming monitor or simply want a PC gaming monitor with FreeSync, the Asus VG245H is a fantastic value. It has virtually no input lag and comes with a ton of features gamers will love.
For PC gamers, it's nice that this monitor goes above 75Hz and supports FreeSync. This adaptive sync technology does a lot of what G-Sync does without the G-Sync cost. Keep in mind, it'll only work with an AMD graphics card.
For console gamers looking for a good monitor, the Asus VG245H is a fantastic option. It has deep blacks, Asus eye care technology to minimize your eye fatigue, and Dual HDMI connectivity so you can have your console and another device on at the same time.
The GamePlus hotkey is useful for all types of gamers. It's a hotkey you can use to give you in-game enhancements.
Overall budget-minded gamers should definitely be looking at this monitor. For PC gamers looking for a cheap FreeSync option, it's a no-brainer. Console gamers can definitely find something cheaper that will work; however, not with as many options.
Pixio PX277 FreeSync IPS Monitor
Have an AMD card and don't want to pay for the G-Sync price? I highly recommend you go with a monitor I was recently able to test out.
The Pixio PX277 uses the same panel as the much more expensive Asus PG279Q and Acer XB271HU and costs hundreds of dollars less.
I was able to test it for frame skipping, ghosting, and pixel response, and this monitor was simply fantastic.
For those worried about the FreeSync Range of 55Hz to 144Hz, this monitor has low framerate compensation.
Overall, it's a good value for a FreeSync IPS monitor and for its panel and one I'd certainly recommend.
Cheap Gaming Monitor Pick Around $100: ASUS VE247H
The ASUS VE247H is another really good TN panel option, one of the better budget gaming monitors available.
It's the modern version of the old ASUS VH236H used in the EVO tournament, with the same panel, a good input lag of 11ms, in a better overall monitor.
It looks nicer than the VH236H, is more power-efficient, and has just about the same price at about $130 apiece.
Response Time vs. Input Lag
Input lag is a measurement of the delay between the time you enter a command on your keyboard, mouse, or controller, and the time it registers on your screen. A low input lag is crucial in "twitch" (time-sensitive) video games where fractions of a second matter.
Input lag is different from response time; the latter is an indicator of how fast a pixel can go from black to white and back again on a particular monitor. Monitor manufacturers tell you about their "gray-to-gray" (GTG) response times, which tend to be lower.
Although response time isn't as important as input lag, response times in excess of 5ms can sometimes produce images that feel blurry or have ghosting, which can affect your gameplay. So if you have the option of lower response time, other things being equal, you'll want to take it.
Is Refresh Rate Really Important for Gaming?
Refresh rate numbers like 60Hz, 120Hz, and 144Hz provide an indicator of how many times per second an image is redrawn on your screen.
The higher the refresh rate, the smoother your picture feels. Overall, refresh rate has a moderate impact on performance, but usually comes at a significant premium in cost.
TN vs. IPS Panels: Resolution, Color Quality, Response Time
TN or twisted nematic is the most common type of LCD panel. TN panels are less expensive and offer lower response times than IPS panels, so until rather recently gaming monitors tended to be TN.
In today's market, most TN panels over 21 inches are considered full HD with 1920 x 1080p resolution. Most TN panels don't go beyond that; monitors that do are generally IPS panels which photo editors use for color accuracy.
Some disadvantages of TN panels are that viewing angles can be distorted, and color is generally limited to 18 bits. Thus, a TN panel can't accurately produce the full 16.7 million colors required for "true color." On the other hand, an IPS panel with 10 bits per RGB, or 30 bits total, has just over 1 billion colors.
Even at wide viewing angles, the color on an IPS monitor is not distorted or washed out. And IPS panels are getting faster.
It's ultimately up to you whether you want an IPS or TN monitor for gaming. IPS monitors reproduce color more clearly and accurately but have slower response times. If you care more about the image than about the responsiveness of your monitor, go with an IPS monitor; if you'd rather have better responsiveness, go with a TN monitor.
Six Cheap and Good Classic Gaming Monitors
Below I discuss six more great gaming monitor options from the past (kind of like bonus footage). Also, don't forget to vote for your favorite!
1. BenQ RL2455HM: A Good Competitive Gaming Monitor
The BenQ RL2455HM, another TN monitor, is a must-have if you're trying to play at an MLG level. It's the Major League Gaming official console gaming monitor.
With a 1ms response time and 6ms input lag, it's ready for any competition, and overall the picture looks pretty good too. Don't get this model confused with the next one on our list, the 2450HT made for the PC. T
he RL2455HM comes with integrated speakers. Unlike on the 2450, the only adjustment you can make is the degree of tilt.
2. BenQ RL2460HT
If you want to be a professional MLG PC gamer, then here's Major League Gaming's official PC monitor for this year, the BenQ RL2460HT. With a 1 ms response time and 0 input lag, it's got the speed you want and all the options you need.
As it was built for games like StarCraft II, it's great for time-sensitive genres and has a lot of preset options that allow you to see better in the game.
It also has gaming ergonomic features like low blue light and flicker free technology that help out your eyes over those long gaming sessions.
3. Old but Good IPS Gaming Monitors From Dell: U2311H and U2412M
If you're looking for an IPS monitor for color accuracy first and gaming Second consider the Dell Ultrasharp U2311H and U2412M. These are both several years old now but have maintained their desirability.
They have a relatively low response time (8ms GTG) and input lag comes in for the Dell U2311H at 8.2ms and the Dell U2412M at 9.4ms.
These models, from Dell's UltraSharp series, have e-IPS panels which create a good picture with wide viewing angles. Their colors are not as accurate as those of the most expensive IPS panels on the market, but they still do a good job overall.
4. ASUS PA238Q: Another Really Solid IPS Option
If you are willing to spend a bit more money, definitely consider the ASUS PA238Q, which has a 2.2ms input lag and a 6ms gray-to-gray response time.
Overall it's my favorite of the 23- to 24-inch IPS monitors available for gaming right now, even though it costs $75 to $100 more than the UltraSharp options above.
6. BenQ XL2730Z: Another Good FreeSync Gaming Monitor
If you're looking for an alternative to the Pixio PX277 I mentioned above, take a look at BenQ's XL2730Z which also comes with FreeSync for under $500.
The monitor itself looks fantastic with a fairly thin bezel, solid stand with red accents, and vibrant colors.
For input lag it comes with virtually no lag and the response time comes in at a cool 1ms. Tools exclusive to BenQ like their Black Equalizer help you to quickly see clearly in the dark. You'll have to determine whether that's something you'll allow yourself to use. For me personally, it makes a huge difference.
Overall, it's a good option in the $500 price range and one you should be looking at.
Input Lag Stat Chart for Classic Monitors
|Monitor||Panel Type||Size (in)||Display Size (Pixels)||Refresh Rate (Hz)||Response Time (ms)||Input Lag (ms)||Price (USD, 8/2015)||G-Sync Built In?|
1920 x 1080
1920 x 1080
1920 x 1080
2560 x 1440
1 ms GTG
same as VG248QE (Tom's Hardware); 3.6 ms (PCmonitors.info)
1920 x 1080
2ms GTG Amazon); 1 ms (BenQ)
6 ms; 10 ms per displaylag.com
1920 x 1080
2013 Dell U2311H
8 ms GTG (Amazon)
1920 x 1200
8 ms GTG
EIZO Foris FS2333-BK
1920 x 1080
3.4 ms (per Eizo)
0.6 to 3 (various sources)
1920 x 1080
6 ms GTG
IEM BenQ XL2720T
1920 x 1080
1 ms GTG
"about one frame"
First-Person Shooter Monitor Summary
When monitor technology changed from CRT to LCD some eight to ten years ago, many gamers held on to their heavy old CRTs, even though the pictures looked so much better on the newer models. They did that because their old monitors had little or no input lag and a higher refresh rate.
Since that time many LCD monitors have been put on the market, including LCD monitors with under one frame or 16.7 ms of input lag. Early LCD gaming monitors had a refresh rate of about 60Hz, which although relatively low was adequate to offset most of the benefits of the old CRTs.
Monitors like the ASUS VH236H gained popularity in professional tournaments like EVO early on because of their low input lag. Input lag on the VH236H was virtually unnoticeable, at about a half a frame or 8.3ms.
My Final Thoughts
Ultimately, input lag, should be one of the determining factors you use when buying a gaming monitor as it gives real-world results. All of the monitors in the list above receive a passing grade on that front.
As manufacturers continue to see the purchasing power of gamers we'll continue to see better monitors more geared towards gaming. What monitor do you have your eye on this year? Is there a monitor that should have been on this list? Speak your mind below!
This article is accurate and true to the best of the author’s knowledge. Content is for informational or entertainment purposes only and does not substitute for personal counsel or professional advice in business, financial, legal, or technical matters.
© 2013 Brandon Hart
Gaming Monitor Discussion and Commentary
Jean-Marc Brault on January 10, 2020:
A higher refresh rate don't give lower latency!?!?!? get 12ms at 60, 100, 120 and 144hz!?!?!?!?
Caleb on January 05, 2019:
Has much changed over the years, is the asus vg248qe still the lowest input lag monitor that is 144hz ?
Brandon Hart (author) from The Game on July 12, 2018:
Nope. who wants a brick on their desk nowadays when there are so many good modern options?