An Engineering Consultant and Professional Photographer with 40 years of experience in digital imaging.
The merits of sRGB, AdobeRGB (aRGB) and ProPhotoRGB colour spaces are frequently the subject of debate and some confusion. Attempts by novices to understand the principles behind these colour spaces are often hindered by the complex, three‑dimensional mathematical transforms used to describe them.
This difficulty can be overcome by referring to a simple one-dimensional linear analogy which describes three fictional methods of encoding vehicle speed, appropriately named (by analogy) sMPH, aMPH and ProMPH. This analogy helps illustrate how image data is encoded and converted between colour spaces and what happens when images are converted or rendered incorrectly. This article concludes with examples of real and synthesised images rendered in different colour spaces.
Suppose engineers wanted to record the variation in forward speed of a motor vehicle at one second intervals over the duration of each journey. The vehicle has a sensor that provides speed readings from 0.0 to 100.0 mph with 1 decimal place at 1 second intervals. Realising they didn’t need 0.1 mph precision and they needed to minimise the memory storage requirements for long journeys, the engineers decided to store each speed reading in a single 8 bit byte (which can only store integer values from 0-255). They devised a simple encoding method which multiplied the sensor readings by 2.5 and then rounded to the nearest whole number. They called this process “Standard MPH encoding” or sMPH for short.
sMPH encoded reading = ROUND(2.5 x Sensor reading)
A speed of 100.0 mph can therefore be encoded in a single 8-bit byte with a value of 250. To recover the original data, the process is simply reversed. They called this process sMPH decoding.
Decoded reading = sMPH encoded reading / 2.5
sMPH encoding allowed speed readings from 0.0 - 100.0 mph to be stored as single 8 bit bytes with values ranging from 0 - 250. The precision has however been reduced from 0.1mph to 1/2.5 = 0.4 mph. This reduction in precision helps compress the data for storage.
Realising that requirements might change in the future, the engineers decided that files of sMPH data should have details of the sMPH encoding/decoding process (“the sMPH profile”) embedded in the file. This would ensure that future users of the data files would know the data inside was sMPH encoded and they would know the correct way to recover (decode) the data.
The sMPH encoding and decoding process is shown schematically in Figure 1.
As technology advanced engineers decided that they needed to record speeds of vehicles that could travel faster (up to 125mph) using a similar (1 byte/reading) file format. To accomplish this they devised a new encoding and decoding method which they called “Advanced MPH” or aMPH for short. To cover the extended speed range they changed the encoding and decoding factor from 2.5 to 2.0
aMPH encoded reading = ROUND(2.0 x Sensor reading)
A speed of 125.0 mph can therefore be aMPH encoded in an 8-bit byte with a value of 250. To recover the original data, the process is simply reversed. They called this process is aMPH decoding.
Decoded reading = aMPH encoded reading / 2.0
aMPH encoding allows speed readings from 0.0 - 125.0 mph to be stored as single 8 bit bytes with values ranging from 0 - 250. The precision has however been further reduced by the extra data compression from 0.4 mph (under sMPH encoding) to 0.5mph (under aMPH encoding). So although aMPH files can hold data for a 25% wider speed range than sMPH, the precision to which those speeds are recorded has been reduced by 20%.
To allow aMPH files to be distinguished from sMPH files they embedded the details of the “aMPH encoding/decoding” process (the "aMPH profile") in the file. This would ensure that future users of the data files would automatically know the data inside was aMPH encoded and the correct way to recover (decode) the data, and should not mistakenly use the sMPH process.
The aMPH encoding and decoding process is shown schematically in Figure 2.
As technology advanced again, it was decided that the system needed to be further adapted to allow speeds up to 150mph to be encoded and decoded. This was achieved by changing the encoding and decoding factor to 5/3 and they called this process Professional MPH (ProMPH for short) encoding.
ProMPH encoded reading = ROUND( 5 x Sensor reading / 3)
A speed of 150.0 mph can therefore be encoded in an 8-bit byte with a value of 250. To recover the original data, the process is simply reversed. They called this process is ProMPH decoding.
Decoded reading = 3 x ProMPH encoded reading / 5
Note that using ProMPH encoding has increased the range of speeds that can be stored by 50% (relative to sMPH). But this reduces the precision to which speed is recorded by 33% to 0.6mph. Realising this reduction was becoming significant the engineers recommended that for high precision applications ProMPH data should be stored in double bytes (16-bit mode).
Analogy with sRGB, aRGB and ProPhotoRGB colour spaces
If sMPH, aMPH and ProMPH are conceptually replaced by sRGB, aRGB and ProPhotoRGB and vehicle speed is replaced with richness of colour (faster speed = richer colour), it’s possible to draw parallels between the process described above and those used to store image data.
When an sRGB image file is created, the image sensor data is encoded using the sRGB standard and the sRGB profile information is (usually) embedded in the file so that the data can be correctly decoded automatically.
The aRGB and ProPhotoRGB standards were developed to allow richer and richer colours to be stored in the file, in a similar way to which aMPH and ProMPH allow higher and higher speeds to be encoded.
The power of the analogy becomes clear when analysing what happens when files are decoded using a different standard to that used to encode the data. For example, what happens if sRGB image data is decoded using aRGB profile, or vice versa? These two examples are considered below.
sRGB Data Decoded Using aRGB Profile
This is analogous to using the aMPH process to decode speed data which was encoded with sMPH. The effects of this are shown in the Figure 3 below. Note how a true vehicle speed of 100mph has been incorrectly decoded as 125 mph. The decoded data indicates the vehicle is going faster than it really was. Therefore, by analogy, when sRGB data is decoded (rendered) using an aRGB profile, the colours will be displayed incorrectly and will appear richer than they should. The situation gets worse if sRGB files are rendered using a ProPhotoRGB profile as the colours will appear richer still.
aRGB Data Decoded Using sRGB Profile
This is analogous to using the sMPH process to decode speed data which was encoded with aMPH. The effects of this are shown in the Figure 4 below. Note how a true vehicle speed of 125mph has been incorrectly decoded as 100 mph. The decoded data indicates the vehicle is going slower than it really was. Therefore, by analogy, when aRGB data is decoded (rendered) using an sRGB profile, the colours will be displayed incorrectly and will appear more muted than they should. The situation gets worse if a ProPhotoRGB file is rendered using a sRGB profile as the colours will appear even more muted.
Missing Profiles, Profile Conversion and Profile Assignment
If files are correctly encoded and include the relevant profile, incorrect decoding errors shouldn’t occur. But there are various scenarios where problems can arise or compromises are required.
If the profile used to encode the data is missing from the file, it's unclear how the data should be decoded. Many systems assume sRGB as a default profile and will apply that profile to decode the data. This is fine if the data was encoded using sRGB, but if aRGB or ProPhotoRGB was used instead, the decoded colours will be rendered incorrectly and will appear more muted than they should (analogous to the scenario in Figure 4).
To avoid creating files with missing profiles it is advisable to embed the colour profile in the image file when saving. Photoshop provides a tick box to “Embed colour profile” when saving images. Photoshop can also be set to give warnings when opening images with missing profiles and ask what to do. These settings are found in the Color Management Polices section of the Edit>Color Settings… menu. It is suggested that all boxes in this section should be ticked, as shown in Figure 5.
Photoshop allows user to assign a profile (Edit>Assign profile…) to an image with a missing profile, or to overwrite the existing profile. This option must be used with caution. Colours in the image will be rendered incorrectly if the profile assigned to an image is not the same as the one used to originally encode the image. Assigning a different profile can be used creatively to make colours appear richer or more muted, but it may be more convenient to adjust the saturation or vibrance sliders instead as these allow more control. However, the “Convert to Profile...” option should be used to change an image from one profile to another without significantly altering the colours.
Convert to Profile
Photoshop allows users to convert (Edit>Convert to Profile…) images from one profile to another. This operation works as follows. Firstly the image data is decoded using the original profile, then (after some adjustment if required*) the data is encoded using the new profile. *Although the conversion process may have some effect on the colours in the image, there are various settings that can be used to control any adjustments that may be needed, as shown in the Conversion Options section of the menu shown in Figure 5. A detailed description of the various options is currently beyond the scope of this document, but there are some potential compromises to be aware of.
- If a ProPhotoRGB image contains a very wide range of colours, then converting to a colour space with less range (e.g. sRGB) will cause some alteration in colour. Colours maybe clipped or de-saturated slightly in an attempt to “squeeze” the larger colour range into the smaller colour space. This process is not reversible. Converting a ProPhotoRGB image to sRGB loses colour information which cannot be recovered by converting from sRGB back ProPhotoRGB.
- A similar compromise occurs, but to a lesser degree when converting from ProPhotoRGB to aRGB, or from aRGB to sRGB. Again the process is not reversible.
Although these compromises may sound daunting a few key points should be remembered.
- The visual differences between correctly rendered sRGB, aRGB and ProPhotoRGB images are relatively small. Indeed, on consumer grade monitors and printers, they can be difficult to spot. Even on professional grade monitors and printers the visual difference is often far less noticeable than the relative sizes of the colour spaces might suggest.
Figure 6 gives an example. This figure was produced by creating ProPhotoRGB, aRGB and sRGB versions of the same RAW image of a Passport Colour Checker Target and then correctly rendering them all in Photoshop and taking a screenshot. Obviously there are limitations in this comparison as all images have been rendered on a monitor with restricted colour space. Therefore, to overcome this limitation, the jpeg files used to produce Figures 6-10 are available on-line here. The images can be downloaded and compared on screen or as printouts.
- The visual differences between incorrectly rendered images are much more noticeable and clearly visible on screen, as illustrated by the Figure 7 below. This figure was produced by creating ProPhotoRGB, aRGB and sRGB versions of a RAW image of a Passport Colour Checker Target and then assigning the wrong profiles to some of them. The central image is a screenshot of the sRGB image rendered in Photoshop using the correct sRGB profile. The surrounding (incorrectly rendered) images are screenshots of the sRGB, aRGB and ProPhoto images rendered in Photoshop with the wrong profile is assigned, as indicated. Note that the differences are now much more obvious than those shown in Figure 6.
- Some of the images on the internet, which are used to demonstrate the differences between each colour spaces, are produced by generating various spectrum gradients in sRGB, aRGB and ProPhotoRGB workspaces using Photoshop. These images need to be interpreted with caution as they contain a large range of mathematically produced colours. These colours are concentrated at the edges of each colour space to deliberately emphasise the differences between each colour space. Such colours can lie outside the range that typical digital cameras are sensitive to, or appear in normal scenes. The spectrum gradient data created by the gradient fill tool in Photoshop is also not encoded (converted) to suit a particular colour space. The same numerical RGB values are simply inserted into the image and then decoded using whatever colour space profile is assigned to the image. Every pixel generated contains at least one colour that is fully saturated (value = 255). This is analogous to filling the vehicle speed data file with values from 0-250 and then examining how each decoding method (sMPH, aMPH or ProMPH) interprets this data.
Examples of a spectrum gradient crossed with a luminosity gradient (often referred to as a Granger chart) created in each colour space are shown in Figure 8. This extreme test shows clear differences between the colour spaces.
- Examples of simple spectrum gradients created in each colour space are shown in Figure 9. Again, this extreme test shows clear visible differences between the colour spaces.
- Comparisons between synthesised images like these are often used to support recommendations to use AdobeRGB or ProPhotoRGB instead of sRGB.
- However…. the differences between digital camera images of real scenes, taken in RAW format, then processed in each of the colour spaces and correctly rendered, will be less noticeable, especially when viewed or printed on consumer grade monitors and printers. This is illustrated by the following images of a real spectrum created by sunlight passing through a prism and projected onto a white sheet of paper to produce a saturated sweep of natural colours. The RAW image was processed to produce sRGB, AdobeRGB and ProPhotoRGB versions. Figure 10 shows a montage of the three images.
Hopefully the above has provided a useful insight into some of the basics behind digital colour spaces. To conclude, I have three recommendations.
- Carry out your own tests to determine which colour space best suits your needs.
- Ensure that your images are embedded/tagged with whichever profile you select.
- Check your editing tools are set to check the colour space of any image opened.
- Photoshop is a registered trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated
- The graphical representations of sRGB, AdobeRGB and ProPhotoRGB colour spaces in the opening figure were produced using the ColorSync Utility application - copyright Apple Inc.
© 2019 Fotimageon
Geoff on August 04, 2019:
Interesting and informative, and a great analogy using MPH to illustrate how different profiles affect images. Thanks for posting this.